Esdpecially some of the Oscillator FX would be rather tricky to replicate. That stuff should keep you busy for a while.
RUHR | Reaktor User Library : Entry | CommunityĪ bit less flexible, no wires, but routing by menus, great sounding, Dot44 by Chet Singer:ĭotCom 44 Modular | Reaktor User Library : Entry | CommunityĬlassic Reaktor style, but working a bit more high level is Chet Singers (again) Ampere:Īmpere Modular | Reaktor User Library : Entry | Community With some experience you can build your own racks and even your own modules (some guys (e.g. The Modular-X by Herwig Krass is basically a Eurorack on screen, which you can wire up as you like it. If you want to play around in Reaktor with something, that behaves more like a "classic" modular synth, here are some recommendations: Once you kind of know what you are doing you can mix and match parts from different user library synths, effects. The synths/effects that come "pre-build" with Reaktor are already quite fun, modifying stuff is not to hard and the user library is fantastic. Luckily you can pick and choose your difficulty. by now, but you start building from a VERY low level even with the standard components and stuff gets rather close to DSP-Programming at core level. It has quite decent sounding filters, oscillators. Be aware, that the basic building blocks that come with Reaktor are rather low level.
I love Reaktor (probably my favourite VST), but it has quite a bit of a learning curve. So I've decided to go with Reaktor since I'm already very familiar with NI's products, and I've heard that it's so versatile that you could practically build Zebra inside Reaktor, though that'd be very complex I'd imagine.Good luck / Have fun exploring! I figured it took a lot of tweaking and experimenting to get great results, but 8-9 months for one song is just, wow! I should probably catch up on some more Celldweller videos. Zoog said at some point that for them a normal working time shedule for a single Angelspit song would be around 8 - 9 months.Hmm, very interesting stuff. PS: might wanna do the same with Angelspit (Zoog is another modular nut - in the good sense).Īll in all, there's a lot of experimenting in this type of music and often the result of "happy accidents" (as in hazard). Unlike many other artists in the genre he's very open when it comes to sharing his tips & rig settings, so I suggest you watch all the videos available on his official YouTube channel. On the other hand, he likes to work with textures obtained by multilayering, but most important, he really loves to twist a sound and hack it to the core - so what you hear is the result of a lot of processing & experimenting - you won't get that result straight out of a synth - be it software or hardware. Clayton is neck-deep into his big modular system.
0 kommentar(er)
